Stock Spotlight

Micron’s Record Rally Flashes a 1995 Warning Signal

Micron (MU) stock is soaring on AI demand, but a rare technical indicator warns of a crash. Here is why the 200-day moving average signals trouble ahead.

Li Wei
Li Wei
Principal, International Investments
Micron’s Record Rally Flashes a 1995 Warning Signal

If you are holding Micron Technology (MU) shares right now, you are likely feeling like the smartest person in the room. The stock is on an absolute tear, riding the artificial intelligence wave to heights not seen since the Y2K scare.

But before you go financing a new yacht based on your unrealized gains, you might want to look at a chart that has some veteran traders sweating.

In this edition of Stock Spotlight, we are looking under the hood of Micron’s parabolic rise. The fundamentals are undeniably strong—AI needs memory, and Micron has it. But a specific technical indicator, one that hasn't flashed this bright red since the days of Windows 95, suggests the party might be about to end abruptly.

The AI Supercycle: Why Everyone Loves Micron

First, let’s give credit where it’s due. Micron isn’t rallying on vaporware. The company is a critical infrastructure player in the generative AI revolution.

On Monday, the stock jumped another 5.5%, marking its fourth record close in five days and its 13th record-breaker of the year. The driver is simple supply and demand economics. The AI models powering ChatGPT and Gemini are voracious consumers of data, and they require specialized, high-bandwidth memory chips to function. Micron is one of the few companies on earth that can mass-produce these chips at scale.

This "AI supercycle" has created a supply shortage reminiscent of the toilet paper panic of 2020, but for silicon. Prices are up, profit margins are expanding, and Wall Street is eating it up. According to FactSet, 88% of analysts covering the stock currently have a "Buy" rating. The consensus is clear: the demand for AI is real, it’s growing, and Micron is positioned to cash in.

But as any seasoned floor trader will tell you, when everyone is on the same side of the boat, it’s time to worry about capsizing.

The "Ominous" Chart: The 200-Day Moving Average

While the fundamental analysts are busy upgrading their price targets, the technical analysts—the folks who study price action and psychology rather than balance sheets—are sounding the alarm.

Jonathan Krinsky, a technical analyst at BTIG, has identified a statistical anomaly that should make any bull pause. He points out that Micron’s stock price has deviated from its 200-day moving average (DMA) to a degree that is historically unprecedented.

For the uninitiated, the 200-DMA is a long-term trend line that smooths out daily price noise to show the "true" direction of a stock. Usually, a stock price hugs this line relatively closely. When it runs too far ahead, it’s like a rubber band stretching—eventually, it has to snap back.

Right now, that rubber band is stretched to the breaking point. Micron is trading approximately 147% above its 200-day moving average.

To put that in perspective, this level of extension has only happened twice in the company’s history. Both times, it ended in disaster.

Case Study 1: The Dot-Com Bubble (2000)

The last time Micron looked this vertical was the winter of early 2000. The internet was going to change the world (it did), and investors were throwing money at anything tech-related (they lost it).

In January 2000, Micron posted a monthly gain that stood as a record for decades—until last month. By July 2000, the stock was trading about 89% above its 200-DMA.

What happened next? The gravity of reality set in. The "new economy" couldn't justify the valuations. Within three months of that peak divergence, Micron shares collapsed 65%. Within a year, they were down 62%.

Case Study 2: The Windows 95 Boom (1995)

For an even scarier parallel, we have to rewind to September 1995. The catalyst back then wasn't AI; it was Microsoft’s Windows 95.

The new operating system was a memory hog. It required significantly more RAM than previous versions, sparking a massive upgrade cycle for personal computers. Consumers were literally lining up at CompUSA to buy memory sticks. Micron, a leading manufacturer, saw its stock go vertical.

On September 11, 1995, the divergence hit a record 124% above the 200-DMA. The narrative was identical to today: "Demand is insatiable, supply is limited, this time is different."

It wasn't different. Three months later, the stock had crashed 42%. Twelve months later? It was down a staggering 77%.

The "This Time is Different" Trap

The most dangerous four words in investing are "This time is different."

Bulls will argue that the 1995 and 2000 crashes were speculative bubbles, whereas today's rally is backed by real earnings from massive corporate clients like NVIDIA and Microsoft. They will point out that the 200-DMA is rising by nearly $2 a day, which could theoretically allow the "divergence" to close without the stock price crashing—a scenario known as "consolidating through time."

That is possible. But history suggests that when a stock gets this far ahead of its skis, the correction is rarely gentle.

The market operates on a mechanism of "pricing in" the future. The 147% premium over the average price suggests that every bit of good news—every future AI chip sale, every margin expansion—is already baked into the cake.

As Krinsky noted in his report to clients, "Positive news is already priced into the stock price." When perfection is priced in, any slight disappointment—a missed earnings beat, a delay in shipping, a broader market cool-down—can trigger a massive sell-off.

The Bottom Line

We are witnessing a historic moment for Micron. The company is executing perfectly in a once-in-a-generation market shift. But stocks do not go up in a straight line forever.

If you are a long-term investor, the fundamentals look solid. But if you are a trader looking at the charts, the ghost of 1995 is screaming at you to take some chips off the table. The rubber band is stretched. It might stretch a little further, but history tells us the snap-back is inevitable—and it usually hurts.

Share this article: